Nowlez vs Google Calendar
Google Calendar is free, familiar, and perfectly good for general scheduling. Plenty of advocates use it as their hearing diary. The problem is not the calendar. It is that Google Calendar has no idea what the courts are doing. Every hearing date is entered by hand from the cause list or the eCourts portal, and once entered it never updates itself. When a matter is adjourned, re-listed, or moved to another bench, the calendar entry is quietly wrong, and nothing tells you.
Nowlez AI Munshi drafts your applications and notices, reads the latest order and tells you what it holds, and researches with citations, and it also keeps your hearing dates in sync with the court record, so a re-listing never leaves a stale date. Your day's hearings reach you on WhatsApp or the App. Pricing is public: a 14-day free trial, then from ₹12,000/year. The comparison below is for advocates deciding whether a manual calendar is worth the risk of a stale date.
Feature comparison
| Nowlez | Google Calendar | |
|---|---|---|
| Hearing dates pulled from the court record | yes (automatic) | No, every date entered by hand |
| Updates when a matter is re-listed or adjourned | Yes | No, the entry goes stale silently |
| Alerts on new orders / status changes | Yes | No, reminders only for events you created |
| Daily cause list matched to your cases | Yes | No |
| Full case context (history, parties, orders, docs) | Yes | Event title and notes only |
| WhatsApp hearing reminders | Yes | Calendar notifications only |
| Court coverage | Supreme Court, High Courts, District Courts & Tribunals | Not court-connected |
| AI legal research + MS Word drafting | Yes | No |
| Price | 14-day free trial, then from ₹12,000/year | Free (general-purpose calendar) |
See if Nowlez fits your practice
14-day free trial. No credit card. Your data stays with you. Export any time.
Start free trial